CENTER AWARDS: Editors Choice: Eric Kayne
This week Lenscratch will be sharing the CENTER Awards winners and the statements by the jurors to help understand their choices.
Congratulations to Eric Kayne for his Third Place win in CENTER’s Editor’s Choice Awards. Recently, Eric was also awarded the Carol Crow Memorial Fellowship, jurored by Maggie Blanchard of Twin Palms Publishers, which includes a solo exhibition at the Houston Center for Photography from May 13 to July 10, 2016.
Eric Kayne was born and raised in San Antonio, Texas. He took his first photography class in sixth grade and continued with photography on and off until he graduated high school. His vagabond academic life post high school took him to the University of California Santa Barbara, the Academy of Art in San Francisco, Collin County Community College, Austin Community College and finally the University of Texas at Austin, where he graduated with a BA in studio art.
In 1999, Eric moved to New York City, where he interned at Magnum Photos, Inc. and had a summer job at the Maine Photographic Workshops as the E-6 process manager. Later, while attending San Antonio College, Eric joined the school newspaper and discovered his love for photojournalism.
Following that, he had his first part-time staff job at the New Braunfels Herald-Zeitung, eventually moving to a sister paper, the Brazosport Facts in Clute, Texas (home of the annual Mosquito Festival) for a full-time position.
After a year, he had had enough of life among the mosquitos and chemical refineries and moved to a small village in Marin County, California, living on the beach, driving a milk truck for an organic creamery, and freelancing for the Marin Independent Journal. Living in the Bay Area inspired Eric to continue his photographic education through workshops and classes at the City College of San Francisco. After two years, he left to attend the School of Visual Communication at Ohio University, eventually earning his MA in Photography.
After Ohio, Eric interned at the San Antonio Express-News, the Seattle Times and The Dallas Morning News. He eventually found a contract staff position at the Houston Chronicle. After 13 months, he was laid off, along with many others. Since that time, he has been an independent freelance photographer.
He now splits his time between editorial and commercial assignments, while creating as much time as possible for personal projects. His clients include Arcade Fire, The Wall Street Journal, Houston Methodist Hospital System, BBVA Compass Bank, H.E.B., and the MD Anderson Cancer Center.
His wife, Carrie Feibel, is the health and science reporter for the NPR affiliate in Houston. They have a three-year-old daughter, Joni.
EDITOR’S CHOICE: Juror’s Statement
Chris McGonigal, Photo Editor, The Huffington Post
It’s not easy going one-by-one through beautiful images and being the one to make the hard choices on who has to go and who has to get left behind, but we all know in editing you have to make those hard decisions. It was such a pleasure to go through these entries. I based my decisions on those submissions on which I would think to myself “This would be really great for our site.” These images offer a view of something different, compelling and a series that just make us want to see more from their creator.
Third, but not at all least, are Eric Kayne’s striking photos that show the people and landscapes in the path of the proposed Keystone XL pipeline. The pipeline was definitely a divisive issue, and Eric’s photos are able to show us in perfectly framed images that there is beauty in these places that is at risk of being changed.
In The Pipeline’s Path
TransCanada’s Keystone XL pipeline (phase IV), now moot after rejection by the Obama administration, was a pipeline designed to duplicate a current pipeline but with a shorter route and larger diameter. Over a period of approximately six years, it had become a point of political contention and a symbol of many, and often contradictory, things: both corporate greed and job creation; energy independence and a disaster waiting to happen. Reading stories about it, I heard plenty from the adversaries on both sides – the oil producers and the environmentalists – but I wasn’t hearing, or seeing, enough from the people who lived directly in the path of the proposed pipeline. I wanted to photograph these people and somehow help tell their stories.
I decided to focus on the pipeline route through Nebraska. Unlike South Dakota, where only one rancher in the entire state refused to sign an easement to let the pipeline through his property, a substantial number of Nebraska farmers and ranchers organized their opposition, eventually forming a non-profit called Bold Nebraska to oppose the pipeline. Dozens had refused to sign easement agreements to allow the pipeline across their land. Nebraska also had the best available logistical information of all the states the pipeline would cross.
I spent a week in November 2014 photographing Nebraskans who were opposed to the pipeline from crossing their property. In July 2015, I went back to photograph people who did sign easements and would let the pipeline cross their property.
The ranchers and farmers I spoke with talked about being stewards of the land, not just for their own families and the generations before them, but stewards of the environment and of America’s food security. They feel there was nothing good about the pipeline. It could be bought and sold long after it was put into the ground; it could have even be sold to a foreign country. It would have been filled with a sandy, corrosive substance that could abrade and degrade the inside of a pipeline, causing a spill. Tar sands contain benzene, a suspected carcinogen that sinks in water. The pipeline would cross the Ogallala Aquifer – one of the world’s largest – and any leak would threaten to pollute this precious resource.
Among the ranchers and farmers who did sign easements, the prevailing attitude was that the pipeline was like any other financial decision that affects their business. Farming and ranching is very expensive, and the extra income seemed to be a welcome addition to their volatile bottom lines.
My motivation was to make compelling images of those who live in the pipeline’s path. TransCanada, the pipeline builder, has deep pockets and even has a polished corporate website featuring photos and video of happy landowners who sold easements to the company. My hope was that my photo essay, in some way, would help to balance out the issue, giving voice to those still fighting on their own for a different pathway, both for this project and for our collective environmental future.
Posts on Lenscratch may not be reproduced without the permission of the Lenscratch staff and the photographer.